FRM vs. CFA: Which Certification Should You Pursue?

by Eduyush Team

FRM vs. CFA: Which Certification Should You Pursue Based on Career Goals, Market Demand, and Skillsets?

Choosing between the Financial Risk Manager (FRM) and Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) certifications can be a crucial step in shaping your career in finance. Both credentials offer excellent opportunities but cater to different career paths. This blog compares FRM vs. CFA across several parameters, including personal preferencescareer goalsmarket demand, and required skill sets.

This comparison will help you make an informed decision about which certification aligns best with your professional aspirations.

FRM vs. CFA: Overview of Certifications

FRM (Financial Risk Manager)

The FRM certification, awarded by the Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP), is specifically tailored for risk management professionals. The program focuses on developing skills in managing and mitigating financial risks across sectors like banking, asset management, insurance, and hedge funds.

  • Focus: Risk management, financial markets, credit risk, operational risk.
  • Target Candidates: Risk professionals, financial analysts, portfolio risk managers.

CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst)

The CFA certification, awarded by the CFA Institute, is widely recognized as the leading qualification in investment management. It emphasizes in-depth knowledge of investment analysisportfolio management, and ethical standards.

  • Focus: Investment management, portfolio analysis, financial reporting, ethics.
  • Target Candidates: Investment bankers, portfolio managers, equity researchers.

FRM vs CPA - Differences

FRM vs. CFA: Key Differences

To help you decide between FRM and CFA, let’s break down the core differences between these two certifications:

Criteria FRM CFA
Focus Area Risk management, market risk, credit risk, operational risk Investment management, portfolio analysis, ethics
Certification Body GARP CFA Institute
Exam Levels 2 parts 3 levels
Time Commitment 1–2 years 2–4 years
Ideal Career Paths Risk manager, financial analyst, corporate risk professional Portfolio manager, investment banker, equity researcher
Global Recognition High in risk management and banking High in investment management and corporate finance
Pass Rate 40–60% across both parts 40–50% across levels
Exam Frequency Twice a year (May and November) Twice a year for Levels I, II; once a year for Level III

Exam Format

  • FRM: The FRM exam is divided into two parts, focusing on risk management tools, quantitative analysis, market and credit risk, and operational risk. It is a four-hour exam for each part, with Part I typically focusing on foundational risk concepts, while Part II delves deeper into advanced risk management strategies.

  • CFA: The CFA exam has three levels, with each level requiring a more in-depth understanding of investment analysis and portfolio management. Each level involves two 3-hour sessions of multiple-choice questions and essay-type questions (for Level III).

Comparison of FRM vs. CFA Based on Personal Preferences

Study Preferences

    • FRM: The FRM exam is divided into two parts, and you can complete the certification in 1–2 years. The exam content is more specialized, focusing on risk management topics, which could be a good fit for professionals who prefer targeted learning.
    • CFA: The CFA exam consists of three levels and requires a longer time commitment of 2–4 years. It covers various topics, including investment analysiseconomics, and portfolio management. Candidates who prefer a holistic approach to finance may find the CFA curriculum more aligned with their interests.

    Career Flexibility

      • FRM: If you have a strong interest in risk management, the FRM certification is more specialized and offers direct career opportunities in areas like market riskcredit risk, and operational risk. However, it may limit flexibility outside of risk-related roles.
      • CFA: The CFA certification provides broader career flexibility in investment bankingasset management, and corporate finance. The CFA could offer more career mobility if you want to move between finance roles.

      Comparison Based on Career Goals

      FRM Career Paths

        • Risk Manager: If you want to work as a financial manager in a financial institution, the FRM certification is ideal. It prepares you for roles where the primary focus is assessing and mitigating risks, such as market and credit risks.
        • Financial Analyst in Risk: You can pursue roles in financial risk analysis for companies, banks, or investment firms, focusing on minimizing financial exposure.

        CFA Career Paths

          • Portfolio Manager: For those aiming to manage investment portfolios for clients or institutions, the CFA certification provides the knowledge and credibility needed to excel in these roles.
          • Investment Banker: If your career goal is to work in investment banking, particularly in mergers and acquisitions or equity research, the CFA credential is highly regarded and can open doors to top-tier firms.

          Which Certification Should You Choose Based on Career Goals?

          • Choose FRM if you want a career in risk management, working in banks, hedge funds, or insurance companies.
          • Choose CFA if you’re targeting a broader career in investment managementportfolio analysis, or corporate finance.

          Market Demand: FRM vs. CFA

          Global Demand for FRM Professionals

            • Risk management is essential in banks, investment firms, and insurance companies worldwide. The growing complexity of global financial systems has increased the demand for FRM-certified professionals, particularly in industries dealing with heavy financial exposure and regulatory requirements.
            • FRM holders are in high demand in roles such as risk analystscredit risk managers, and chief risk officers, especially in regions like North AmericaEurope, and Asia.

            Global Demand for CFA Professionals

              • The CFA certification is widely recognized across industries like investment bankingasset management, and private equity. With the continuous growth of the global investment industry, demand for CFA charter holders is robust, particularly in financial hubs like New YorkLondonHong Kong, and Dubai.
              • CFA holders are sought after for roles like portfolio managersfinancial advisors, and investment analysts.

              Which Certification Has Higher Market Demand?

              • FRM: Strong demand in risk-heavy industries such as bankinghedge funds, and corporate risk management.
              • CFA: Greater demand in investment management and financial advisory, with more corporate finance and equity analysis opportunities.

              Salary levels of FRM vs CFA

              • CFA: Average salary: $126,000 globally, with variation based on location and role
              • FRM: Average salary: $90,000 globally, with higher earnings at senior positions

              Skillsets Required: FRM vs. CFA

              FRM Skillsets

                • Quantitative Analysis: Strong math skills and an understanding of financial models are crucial.
                • Risk Assessment: You must be proficient in identifying, measuring, and mitigating financial risks.
                • Regulatory Knowledge: Familiarity with global risk regulations and compliance standards is essential.

                CFA Skillsets

                  • Financial Analysis: A deep understanding of financial statementsvaluation models, and investment theory is critical.
                  • Portfolio Management: You must develop strategies for managing investments balancing risk and reward.
                  • Ethical Standards: Mastery of ethical guidelines in finance is a significant component of the CFA curriculum.

                  Which Certification Matches Your Skillset?

                  • FRM: Best suited for professionals who excel in quantitative analysis and are keenly interested in risk management.
                  • CFA: Ideal for those strong in financial analysisvaluation, and portfolio management.

                  FRM vs CFA - comparison on difficulty of pass rates

                  • CFA:
                    • Overall pass rate: Around 20-25% across all levels (from Level 1 registration to completing Level 3).
                    • Requires consistency and ability to tackle a broad range of financial topics.
                  • FRM:
                    • Overall pass rate: Around 40-50% (when factoring in both parts).
                    • Requires specialized knowledge in risk and quantitative analysis, making it less broad but equally demanding.

                  FRM vs. CFA: Frequently Asked Questions

                  Which certification is better for investment banking?

                    The CFA certification is more aligned with investment banking roles, especially in areas such as equity researchmergers and acquisitions, and financial advisory.

                    Is FRM more specialized than CFA?

                       FRM specializes in risk management, while CFA focuses on investmentcorporate finance, and portfolio management.

                      Can I pursue both FRM and CFA?

                        Yes, many professionals pursue both certifications to enhance their risk management and investment analysis skills.However, pursuing both requires significant time and effort.

                        Which certification has a higher earning potential?

                          CFA holders generally earn higher salaries, especially in investment banking and portfolio management roles. However, FRM professionals in risk management roles at major financial institutions can also command competitive salaries.

                          FRM vs CPA Which Certification Should You Pursue?

                          The decision between FRM and CFA ultimately depends on your career goals and area of interest within finance. Here’s a breakdown to help you decide:

                          Choose FRM If:

                          • You are interested in risk management, especially in market, credit, or operational risks.
                          • You want to work in bankinginsurance, or risk advisory roles.
                          • You prefer a shorter certification path (1–2 years) focused on risk management.

                          Choose CFA If:

                          • You want to build a career in investment managementportfolio management, or equity research.
                          • You are aiming for roles in investment bankingasset management, or financial analysis.
                          • You are prepared to commit to a longer certification process (2–4 years) with a broader investment focus.

                          Conclusion: Which one is right for you, FRM or CFA?

                           FRM and CFA are prestigious certifications, but the best choice depends on your preferencescareer goals, and the skillsets you want to develop. If you’re passionate about risk management, the FRM certification is ideal. However, if your interest lies in investment analysis or portfolio management, the CFA certification offers broader career options.

                          To help you make the best decision, consider where your career goals lie, evaluate the market demand for each certification in your region, and assess which skill sets you want to master. Whichever you choose, both certifications will help you advance in the competitive world of finance.

                          For more detailed guidance on certification paths, check out our related articles on FRM Registration Process

                          Read our other comparisons


                          Leave a comment

                          Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

                          This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.


                          FAQs

                          The FRM certification does not have strict educational prerequisites, making it accessible to individuals from various backgrounds such as finance, economics, engineering, or even law. However, candidates typically have some familiarity with financial markets, risk management, or quantitative analysis. Practical experience or academic exposure to finance-related topics will be helpful, but not mandatory.

                          FRM is generally regarded as highly specialized in risk management compared to the broader scope of the CFA, which covers investments, economics, and portfolio management. The FRM exam is technical and quantitatively demanding, especially in areas like value-at-risk (VaR), derivatives, and credit risk models. It’s a strong choice for those interested in financial risk roles specifically, whereas the CFA is more suited for broader finance careers.

                          On average, candidates spend about 200-300 hours preparing for each part of the exam. This can vary depending on your background:

                          The FRM exams are known for their difficulty, so disciplined study and practice are crucial.

                          Yes, the FRM complements other certifications like the CFA or an MBA by deepening expertise in risk management. It’s particularly valuable if you are pursuing or transitioning to risk-focused roles such as risk management, risk consulting, or trading. Many professionals in broader finance careers, like investment banking or asset management, pursue FRM to enhance their understanding of risk frameworks.

                          The exams are heavily focused on practical and analytical problem-solving. Questions require not only knowledge of risk theories but also the ability to apply concepts like VaR, credit derivatives, and stress testing in real-world scenarios. This is different from some finance certifications that may emphasize more theoretical or conceptual knowledge.

                          You can retake Part II at any subsequent exam session (exams are offered twice a year, in May and November). You haveup to five yearsto pass Part II after passing Part I. If you don’t pass within this timeframe, you will need to retake Part I as well.

                          No, you can only claim the FRM designation after completing two years of relevant full-time work experience in risk management or related fields. This experience must be verified by GARP. You can, however, mention that you are a “FRM Part I/II candidate” while you’re working toward the full designation.

                          Once you have earned the FRM designation, GARP expects you to participate inContinuing Professional Development (CPD), although it’s currently not mandatory. CPD encourages FRMs to maintain and update their knowledge in risk management through professional learning activities, ensuring they remain relevant in the field.